Re: explicit material ( Re: (OT) Perfect Blue)


to tenchi@ml.usagi.org
from Shadow6865@aol.com
subject Re: explicit material ( Re: (OT) Perfect Blue)
date Wed, 1 Dec 1999 17:32:59 EST
In a message dated 12/1/99 1:15:07 AM, j.michael@pmail.net writes:

<< 
    yep, sex is normal... PORN is immoral.
 I   personally find certain sex acts wrong, and I don't feel they should be 
shared with children. Children should not be introduced to porn, (actually, 
no one should) when it is time to introduce sex and sexual material to 
children, they are no longer children. 
So ergo, I do not feel children should be exposed to sexually explicit 
material.

        Next you will tell us masturbation causes blindness, right? If you 
find PORN immoral that is fine, don't watch it but do not prevent or lecture 
anyone who wants to watch porn. It's a personal decision that people can make 
for themselves.

Violence and sexual material are completely different, and saying what is 
good criteria for violence should equal the criteria for sexual material is 
absurd.

        Yes and no. I would rather have a little kid watch something with sex 
in it rather than a violence filled movie like Die Hard.

Exposure of violence to children should try to be kept to a minimum, wheras 
sexual material should not enter a child's criteria anywhere.

        I agree with your statement about violence but disagree with your 
statement about sex. Sex is wonderful, natural, and dare I say it 
FUN!!!!!!!!!!!!! (not that I know from experience ;) Kids need to learn about 
sex early on so they can tell the difference between what it right and wrong 
for someone to do to them. Kids learn about sex at a younger age these days 
so might as well tell them the truth about it.

Search field Search string

archive list

unauthorized access prohibited
MLtools V3.1 Copyright (c) Usagi Labs