Re: explicit material ( Re: (OT) Perfect Blue)


to tenchi@ML.usagi.org
from J Michael <j.michael@pmail.net>
subject Re: explicit material ( Re: (OT) Perfect Blue)
date Wed Dec 01 01:14:00 GMT 1999
<<
Why? Who got this idea? Sex is something normal, violence not. Sure you
shouldn't show porn movies to little kids, but I see no problem showing
teenagers some erotic scenes. I don't think that will turn anyone into
sexmaniacs.

>     Of course, a better question to ask is, "Is violence wrong?"

Yes it is, for minors that is. Depending how it's shown, but generally I
think it's a bad thing to show to children.

Dewa
Schobronics>>

    yep, sex is normal... PORN is immoral.
I	 personally find certain sex acts wrong, and I don't feel they should be shared
with children. Children should not be introduced to porn, (actually, no one should)
when it is time to introduce sex and sexual material to children, they are no longer
children.
So ergo, I do not feel children should be exposed to sexually explicit material.

Violence and sexual material are completely different, and saying what is good criteria
for violence should equal the criteria for sexual material is absurd.

Exposure of violence to children should try to be kept to a minimum, wheras sexual
material should not enter a child's criteria anywhere.
nik

Search field Search string

archive list

unauthorized access prohibited
MLtools V3.1 Copyright (c) Usagi Labs