Re: (OT)Earthquakes CONTINUITY
to | tenchi@ml.usagi.org
|
from | J Michael <j.michael@pmail.net>
|
subject | Re: (OT)Earthquakes CONTINUITY
|
date | Thu Sep 30 23:35:59 GMT 1999
|
<<d unatural disasters are a preview of the Book of Revelations.
First of all the milenium changes in they year 2001 not 2000. Why? Simply,
there was never a year Zero. Secondly, if the Judgement Day/Revelations is
supposed to happen 2000 years after the death of Jesus Christ then it would
have happened years ago. Most historians and scholars agree that the real
2000th anniversary of the death of Jesus happened in 1997 and that is the
conservative estimate. It probably happened closer to 1993.>>
actually if ya wanna get technical, he was off by six years, ergo the millenial marker
on which he based the calender on (birth of Christ) hit the 2000 year mark in 1995.
If you're gonna be wrong about the 2000 year marker it might as well be the year 2000
and not 2001, I mean, is 2000 any wronger than 2001?
no, not really.
so let the masses think it's the millenium on Jan 1 2000, what the Hell.
nik
unauthorized access prohibited
MLtools V3.1 Copyright (c) Usagi Labs