Re: 101- was- Washuu & Mihoshi ?


to tenchi@usagi.jrd.dec.com
from tomar@iastate.edu
subject Re: 101- was- Washuu & Mihoshi ?
date Thu, 1 Aug 1996 09:48:45 -0500
Tenchi ML,

Howard Tom <howard@CAM.ORG> said:

[clipping]

>>        That is NOT how it is written, which means you are showing a serious
>>problem with the translator of the bootleg.  I don't want to be quoting the
>>Bootleg, because that is what it is, but in it Ryo-ohki, Washu, and Kagato
>>are stated in a separately punctuated simple sentence as being "inorganic".
>>        How can Ryo-ohki be said to wear a style of clothing (before ep.11,
>>anyway B-)), or be said to be in a particular style. The sentence and
>>context are too simple to allow this, you are reaching to patch this
>>together, Glenn.
>
>        A flip through the liner notes of the first series would reveal that
>the design for an 'adult' Ryo-oh-ki was already established. You may (or may
>not) assume that rules for clothing and equipment design for her were also
>similarly established. 

You believe the liner notes?!!?!  ^_^

Tomar
aka tomar@iastate.edu

Tomar: aka tomar@iastate.edu   			|From "The Item", AX 96 Intro
Temporary Summer Home:      			|"Are we happy?"
http://www.public.iastate.edu/~tomar/anime.html |"We're happy!"

Search field Search string

archive list

unauthorized access prohibited
MLtools V3.1 Copyright (c) Usagi Labs