[tenchi:105882] Re: Re:OVA 19
to | tenchi@usagi.org
|
from | JLHOnami@mchsi.com
|
subject | [tenchi:105882] Re: Re:OVA 19
|
date | Sun, 10 Apr 2005 22:00:55 +0000
|
> --- AstroNerdBoy <usr1054@astronerdboy.com> wrote:
>
>
> > Surpises like this are often unpopular though. Some fans like TS and myself
> don't have
> > a problem with it and others find the surprise so surprising as to be
> unacceptable. I
> > can certainly understand that. ^_^
>
>
> I don't think I fall into either of those categories. THE SIXTH SENSE was a
> huge
> shocker, but the movie was fairly entertaining despite some inconsistencies. I
> have a
> problem with the episode being illogical and certain aspects of it being
> incomprehensible.
>
>
> > >What about all the international fans who have no access to that information?
> >
> > The series wasn't written for international fans. It was written for Japanese
> TM!R
> > otaku. There's a reason we international fans (and I'll narrow it down to
> just
> > English-speaking fans) are hosed for the extra canon materials. Companies in
> the US
> > don't see that they'll make money bringing the TM!R novels to the US. While
> the books
> > have sold well in Japan, there's a feeling they wouldn't sell well in the US.
> Should
> > the "Slayers" novels do well, TokyoPop may take a risk, but I'm not holding my
> > breath.
>
> But the basis of my complaint is that we international fans could have easily
> been
> included if some very simple changes were made to the material. These changes
> could have
> benefitted the Japanese fans as much as it would international fans.
>
>
>
> > >What about the Japanese fans who read that other material who didn't pick up
> on the
> > vague hinting of the novels?
> >
> > Like TS didn't? TS thought the hint ment that Misaki would get drunk and
> terrorize the
> > galaxy that way (or something like that -- not to put words in TS's mouth).
> *lol* But
> > now that the truth has been revealed, he and other fans went, "Oh! So
> > THAT'S what K-sensei was refering too. I get it now."
>
> I just don't think that's good enough. If he wants to tell the story like that,
> it's
> fine, but that DOESN'T make the story better. In my opinion it makes the story
> worse.
>
>
> > > For Kajishima, it was not important to include any explanation, and that is
> poor
> > storytelling. Like a joke without a punchline.
> >
> > I've already listed tons of stuff that could be considered poor storytelling
> in another
> > post.
>
> Proving that those apples are apples doesn't make this an orange <hopefully that
> made
> sense. If not, just know that I find any of those other problems you may have
> mentioned
> irrelevant to the fact that the MIsaki thing is a problem.>
>
>
> > Again, I've had major problem with K-sensei's minimalist approach to the
> OAV's.
> > That said, I do understand that with only six episodes, you are limited in
> > what you can and can't do, but even I say that he could have done better. So
> I don't
> > want you thinking that I'm giving K-sensei a total pass here. I'm not. I do
> feel that
> > I see the bigger picture and while I may not agree with it all, I do accept
> > it.
>
> I guess what I am asking is that he be a better storyteller. I just don't
> understand why
> such glaring problems go unfixed when a minimal amount of repair is needed to
> make all
> well. One thing I will say in praise of this episode (and there were several
> things to
> praise, at that) is that the episode was interesting.
> nik
>
>
>
> __________________________________
>
unauthorized access prohibited
MLtools V3.1 Copyright (c) Usagi Labs