replicant wrote:

>------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C2E1EA.C4C532D0
>	charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>These are kinda risqu=E9 pics, but they are *NOT* porn.
>It=92s a new type of clothing starting to surface in Japan
>that I have seen mentioned on several sites. This is the
>first working link of pics I have found though.
>
>http://kode-fu.com/shame/2003_02_16_archive.shtml#90356484
>
>  
>
Looks fake to me. Notice how, despite the theoretical silk-screening,
the perpective is always correct to the camera? And the pictures match
up unnaturally well to the actual pose of the girl. Unless it has some
sort of optical effect like those images that look different depending
on the angle, I'd say those are not real.

Certainly sounds Japanese, tho. ^_^

-K.T.K, whose motherboard fried last week AND is going through
midterms... suck!