Brad:

> If they don't care about the validity issue at all, and validity has no
> meaning in Ranma 1/2, then why would they bother thinking that Ukyo's is
> invalid?  You're trying to have your cake and eat it too, Don.
 
	In that case it's okay, too.  If they don't care abotu her engagement,
it's as good as invalid.  I don't think it makes a difference both way. 
If they treat the engagement as valid and don't do anything about it, it
means they don't really care about her claim on Ranma, for otherwise
you'll have 'let's-kill-Ukyou' plans, too.  If they treat the engagement
as invalid and don't do anything about it (such as telling her she
doesn't have a claim), it still points toward the same conclusion, that
they still don't really care about her claim on Ranma.

> And there's *no way* Ukyo is less of a threat than Kodachi.

	Okay, but I don't think she could be a bigger threat than Shampoo,
either.  The cast does not take her seriously so far as the race for
Ranma's concerned.  Heck, she only has one story, Ten Year Sauce story,
that she solely plays a major part toward getting Ranma.


Don
Akane's Dojo - http://home.sprynet.com/sprynet/dwang/ad.htm
"Future?  What about future?"
"We have no future."