Gnollman's post


to ranma@usagi.jrd.dec.com
from Caroline Seawright <caseawr@ecr.mu.oz.au>
subject Gnollman's post
date Thu, 1 May 1997 01:16:01 +1000 (EST)
> Excellent post, BTW.  It said a lot of things I agree wholeheartedly 
> with, and a few I didn't, but on the whole, it had to be said. 

*nod* She did make a number of good points, ne?

> > Where's Ruben's protectors? Why does he get flames when he's not the only
> > one at fault?
> Ruben has his protectors.  We're just too adult to go flaming off when we 
> only know part of the story.  It's not our place to flame anyway-- we 
> should be helping instead.

Exactly what I posts when this mess flaired up for the first time. But
I guess that the Emily Faction didn't bother reading it, or forgot it,
or didn't give a damn.

Here it is again:

FLAME? NO!

PRIVATE E-MAIL SUPPORT? YES!

PRIVATE FLAME? NO!

PUNISH YOURSELF OVER THIS MATTER? NO!

PUNISH SOMEONE ELSE? NO!

Does everyone understand it now? Read over and over until you remember
it! _Everyone_, including Ruben and Emily! Memorise it, and then you
won't ever be at fault in someone else's _private_ business!

> > There's a lot of one-sided hypoctitical flamers out there.
> Agreed.  Far be it from _me_ to quote the bible, but doesn't it say "Let 
> he who is without blame throw the first stone?"  Far be it from me to 
> preach, but some people need to take this, and the golden rule more into 
> account, especially when dealing with people's emotions.

Exactly what I was thinking.

> > The fan club should shut the hell up and get back to their own lives,
> > instead of trying to fuck up someone else's, when it's none of their
> > business.
> Yay!  Thank you, Kun-chan, for putting that as bluntly as possible.  
> Maybe it will actually penetrate skulls now.

I really hope so, I really do.

Kun-chan...


Search field Search string

archive list

unauthorized access prohibited
MLtools V3.1 Copyright (c) Usagi Labs