Gnollman's post
to | ranma@usagi.jrd.dec.com
|
from | Caroline Seawright <caseawr@ecr.mu.oz.au>
|
subject | Gnollman's post
|
date | Thu, 1 May 1997 01:16:01 +1000 (EST)
|
> Excellent post, BTW. It said a lot of things I agree wholeheartedly
> with, and a few I didn't, but on the whole, it had to be said.
*nod* She did make a number of good points, ne?
> > Where's Ruben's protectors? Why does he get flames when he's not the only
> > one at fault?
> Ruben has his protectors. We're just too adult to go flaming off when we
> only know part of the story. It's not our place to flame anyway-- we
> should be helping instead.
Exactly what I posts when this mess flaired up for the first time. But
I guess that the Emily Faction didn't bother reading it, or forgot it,
or didn't give a damn.
Here it is again:
FLAME? NO!
PRIVATE E-MAIL SUPPORT? YES!
PRIVATE FLAME? NO!
PUNISH YOURSELF OVER THIS MATTER? NO!
PUNISH SOMEONE ELSE? NO!
Does everyone understand it now? Read over and over until you remember
it! _Everyone_, including Ruben and Emily! Memorise it, and then you
won't ever be at fault in someone else's _private_ business!
> > There's a lot of one-sided hypoctitical flamers out there.
> Agreed. Far be it from _me_ to quote the bible, but doesn't it say "Let
> he who is without blame throw the first stone?" Far be it from me to
> preach, but some people need to take this, and the golden rule more into
> account, especially when dealing with people's emotions.
Exactly what I was thinking.
> > The fan club should shut the hell up and get back to their own lives,
> > instead of trying to fuck up someone else's, when it's none of their
> > business.
> Yay! Thank you, Kun-chan, for putting that as bluntly as possible.
> Maybe it will actually penetrate skulls now.
I really hope so, I really do.
Kun-chan...
unauthorized access prohibited
MLtools V3.1 Copyright (c) Usagi Labs