>the Tech FAQ is finally ready for publication, pending this final 
>review

I think that many of the footnote references should have been part of
the FAQ proper. Most of the people who would be interested in this are
likely to be well versed in the manga anyway.Right now, many of the
sections still sound vague. 
Take section 4 for example. The footnotes really deserved to be part of
the section.

>Special thanks to:

>Chan Wei Lik Edward Chang

Missing comma between my name and Chang's. Thanks for the compliment!

>[10] V17 Ch100: Skuld creates several 10-dimensional devices with no 
>special equipment, so she must be at least 10D.

Wrong chapter. The only people in chapter 100 are Keiichi, Bell, Peorth
and Welsper. You were refering to V6 Ch39 perhaps?

>at least an unconscious one, for a short time before failing.[22]

That should be [21] not [22]

>Normally, before a goddess acquires an angel egg, she must first 
>demonstrate that she is sufficiently powerful to control an angel.

I think you should drop this sentence. It isn't even implied in the
manga.

You marked [41] twice by mistake.

>4C.  CAN A GODDESS LOSE HER ANGEL?

>>However, lending ones angel does not carry as great a penalty. 
>>Apparently, when an
angel is lent the goddess retains consciousness as well as some level of
contact and ultimate control but is greatly weakened, unable to
move.[43]<<

This part of the first paragraph should be moved to the second
paragraph. It's more appropriate there.

This just gets better and better, but please consider integrating the
footnotes into the actual FAQ.