> It is interesting to note that Fujishima never
> mentioned that 10
> dimensional thing again after volume 5. Maybe he is
> thinking that it was
> a mistake?

Actually, a majority of current theory is based on an
11 dimensional model. Also, the 'string' analogy is
always being modified and altered as understanding as
well as theory advance and change.

I suppose that it's close enough for government work,
got most of the theory down right. I'd have to pull a
couple of my books for an in depth discussion though,
and I've got enough projects at this point. Besides, I
havn't done hard core theoretical physics in a year.
The math would probably give me headaches.

KITSU