On Sun, 5 Mar 1995, Matatabi wrote:

> I hope someone actually take the effort to scan the entire 4x6 picture
> On a HPIIcx scanner it'll take >30 scans, which I do not have the
> time to do.  :(

Wouldn't it be easier to take a photo of it, then scan that? It might 
take a few tried to get the lighting and camera position correct but the 
results should be rather close to a true scan (on some horrendously 
expensive drum scanner).